<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: blank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/blank/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/blank</link>
	<description>News about Alison Bechdel&#039;s comic strip Dykes to Watch Out For, and her graphic novel Fun Home</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 23:11:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=407</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Empirical</title>
		<link>http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/blank#comment-242076</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Empirical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/blank#comment-242076</guid>
		<description>According to Time Magazine, while she was mayor Palin tried to fire a librarian who refused to go along with her plans to ban books.

Don&#039;t Mess With Our Librarians!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Time Magazine, while she was mayor Palin tried to fire a librarian who refused to go along with her plans to ban books.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t Mess With Our Librarians!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie Jochild</title>
		<link>http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/blank#comment-240929</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Jochild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/blank#comment-240929</guid>
		<description>P.S.  For those who wanted documentation on Palin&#039;s extremist views on specific reproductive issues, you can find them in this Youtube &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6b3tU0CAUo&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;video&lt;/a&gt;.

The text reads:

Does John McCain&#039;s choice for Vice President share your family&#039;s values?
 
Sarah Palin opposes the use of birth control pills and condoms—even among married people. 
Source: Political Wire, 8/30/2008 

Sarah Palin opposed sex education in Alaska schools. 
Source: The Politico, 9/1/2008 

She even opposes abortion even in cases of rape. 
Source: The Huffington Post, 9/1/2008 

Are these your family values?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.  For those who wanted documentation on Palin&#8217;s extremist views on specific reproductive issues, you can find them in this Youtube <a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6b3tU0CAUo' rel="nofollow">video</a>.</p>
<p>The text reads:</p>
<p>Does John McCain&#8217;s choice for Vice President share your family&#8217;s values?</p>
<p>Sarah Palin opposes the use of birth control pills and condoms—even among married people.<br />
Source: Political Wire, 8/30/2008 </p>
<p>Sarah Palin opposed sex education in Alaska schools.<br />
Source: The Politico, 9/1/2008 </p>
<p>She even opposes abortion even in cases of rape.<br />
Source: The Huffington Post, 9/1/2008 </p>
<p>Are these your family values?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie Jochild</title>
		<link>http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/blank#comment-240919</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Jochild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/blank#comment-240919</guid>
		<description>Londonboy, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s bashing to point out where she stands on issues, especially since she&#039;ll be VP to an elderly man who&#039;s had cancer four times, won&#039;t release his medical records, and spent five years being tortured (all medical risks).  For me, the main point is that McSame selected her, which speaks to his judgment.  Interestingly, I&#039;d posted at Group News Blog the day before her announcement as VP as to the unfitness of McSame to lead.  He&#039;s mentally unfit to the same extent that Dubya is/was.  

But Palin is worse.  She&#039;s the chosen candidate of a group who is open about wanting to convert the United States into a theocracy.  The Margaret Atwood references others have made are quite apt.  Our Constitution is in dire peril, and we have, I believe, THIS election to restore both it and our continued existence as the country we have been in the world prior to 2000.  

I&#039;m voting &lt;strong&gt;against&lt;/strong&gt; the Right Wing revolution more than I&#039;m voting for Obama.  He was not even my third choice (nor was Hillary), but what he lacks in experience and actual insight (not the rhetorical kind) is made up by advisers who are &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; bat-shit crazy End-Timers.  He&#039;s a politician, not so much a leader, but a politician is sufficient to stop our decline while we wait for an FDR or Harriet Tubman.  

And Shado, I know it looks suspicious, the overlapping pregnancies, but there are photos of Palin very pregnant.  It does sound nutty for her to risk her baby on a long plane flight in order to have it born in Alaska, but it&#039;s her particular bent to be that reckless, it&#039;s not a cover-up for her daughter&#039;s pregnancy.  I wish all those children well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Londonboy, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s bashing to point out where she stands on issues, especially since she&#8217;ll be VP to an elderly man who&#8217;s had cancer four times, won&#8217;t release his medical records, and spent five years being tortured (all medical risks).  For me, the main point is that McSame selected her, which speaks to his judgment.  Interestingly, I&#8217;d posted at Group News Blog the day before her announcement as VP as to the unfitness of McSame to lead.  He&#8217;s mentally unfit to the same extent that Dubya is/was.  </p>
<p>But Palin is worse.  She&#8217;s the chosen candidate of a group who is open about wanting to convert the United States into a theocracy.  The Margaret Atwood references others have made are quite apt.  Our Constitution is in dire peril, and we have, I believe, THIS election to restore both it and our continued existence as the country we have been in the world prior to 2000.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m voting <strong>against</strong> the Right Wing revolution more than I&#8217;m voting for Obama.  He was not even my third choice (nor was Hillary), but what he lacks in experience and actual insight (not the rhetorical kind) is made up by advisers who are <em>not</em> bat-shit crazy End-Timers.  He&#8217;s a politician, not so much a leader, but a politician is sufficient to stop our decline while we wait for an FDR or Harriet Tubman.  </p>
<p>And Shado, I know it looks suspicious, the overlapping pregnancies, but there are photos of Palin very pregnant.  It does sound nutty for her to risk her baby on a long plane flight in order to have it born in Alaska, but it&#8217;s her particular bent to be that reckless, it&#8217;s not a cover-up for her daughter&#8217;s pregnancy.  I wish all those children well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LondonBoy</title>
		<link>http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/blank#comment-240819</link>
		<dc:creator>LondonBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 22:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/blank#comment-240819</guid>
		<description>What this Palin-bashing is starting to remind me of is the Ferraro-bashing in 1984, though from the opposite side of the political spectrum, of course. If this runs in parallel, we&#039;re due for about another week of putting Palin through the wringer, then we&#039;ll all go back to focussing on the head of the ticket, with a blip for the Palin scandal of choice, corresponding to the Zaccaro failure to file tax returns.

I think my main concern about Palin as a candidate is that she presumably believes she is prepared for the job of president should McCain become unable to complete the job, which seems to speak volumes about her ego. She is as weak in foreign affairs as Obama, having dealt with foreign government agencies and investors only as governor of a single state, and in times like these it&#039;s hard to see how she could perform well. Plus she is as gaffe-prone as Truman and Ford.

Meanwhile, back in London I&#039;ve re-joined the Green Party!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What this Palin-bashing is starting to remind me of is the Ferraro-bashing in 1984, though from the opposite side of the political spectrum, of course. If this runs in parallel, we&#8217;re due for about another week of putting Palin through the wringer, then we&#8217;ll all go back to focussing on the head of the ticket, with a blip for the Palin scandal of choice, corresponding to the Zaccaro failure to file tax returns.</p>
<p>I think my main concern about Palin as a candidate is that she presumably believes she is prepared for the job of president should McCain become unable to complete the job, which seems to speak volumes about her ego. She is as weak in foreign affairs as Obama, having dealt with foreign government agencies and investors only as governor of a single state, and in times like these it&#8217;s hard to see how she could perform well. Plus she is as gaffe-prone as Truman and Ford.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, back in London I&#8217;ve re-joined the Green Party!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shadocat</title>
		<link>http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/blank#comment-240659</link>
		<dc:creator>shadocat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/blank#comment-240659</guid>
		<description>Maggie,
   
     My inner BS clock is thinking this pregnancy story is just cover for the other pregnancy story; in any other circumstance, I wouldn&#039;t care about any of it, except for Palin&#039;s views on birth control, etc. I too, am offended by McCain and frankly, other male commentators who think Hilary&#039;s supporters only cared about her gender---I mean come on!

     On another note, doesn&#039;t she look like a cross between Will &amp; Grace&#039;s Karen Walker and Tina Fey? I&#039;m writing the Saturday Night Live sketch in my head right now....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maggie,</p>
<p>     My inner BS clock is thinking this pregnancy story is just cover for the other pregnancy story; in any other circumstance, I wouldn&#8217;t care about any of it, except for Palin&#8217;s views on birth control, etc. I too, am offended by McCain and frankly, other male commentators who think Hilary&#8217;s supporters only cared about her gender&#8212;I mean come on!</p>
<p>     On another note, doesn&#8217;t she look like a cross between Will &amp; Grace&#8217;s Karen Walker and Tina Fey? I&#8217;m writing the Saturday Night Live sketch in my head right now&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie Jochild</title>
		<link>http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/blank#comment-240599</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Jochild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/blank#comment-240599</guid>
		<description>Palin as a choice was not vetted (McSame had met her exactly once and was apparently unaware, for example, of her current investigation on abuse of office charges) nor was she cleared through the RNC.  It appears to have been a desperation move on his part.  There&#039;s many theories about WHY he went this course.  Here&#039;s the predominant ones floating around on progressive blogs:

(1)  She is cloud-cuckoo-land Religious Right crazy.  They are ECSTATIC at this choice, and have reversed their move away from McSame now to raising money hand over fist for th RNC.  She is far more to the right than Reagan, Quayle or Dubya himself in terms of religious fanaticism.  Like, she may be part of that small subgroup of fundie who believe the Earth is flat (because the Bible doesn&#039;t say it&#039;s round -- we have a member of the Texas House of Reps who has attempted to stop schools from teaching &quot;round earth theory&quot; -- I&#039;m not making this up.)  Therefore, he took his orders from Dobson via Cheney.

(2)  Tim &quot;We don&#039;t need no stinkin&#039; bridge inspections&quot; Pawlenty, Mitt &quot;Magic Underwear&quot; Romney, and Joe &quot;Slip Me Some Tongue Dubya&quot; Lieberman all said no to McSame because after the Democratic National Convention, it was clear he was going to lose.

(3)  He succumbed to his need to be surrounded by beauty queens on all fronts, and he thought it would make him look better standing next to her.  

(4)  He thought those who had supported Hillary would vote for any vagina at all.

(5)  It&#039;s a brilliant Roveian plot to draw out the massive lefti woman-hating and rural-bashing rhetoric that was exhibited on far too many blogs during our own nominees campaign, disgusting women (especially working class women) and those who identify with rural values (not necessarily those who live in rural areas) to such an extent that they will swing to McCain for the election.  I have to admit, some so called &quot;liberal&quot; males out there are already proving this one right, they just cannot pass up the read meat of attacking a woman on gender terms.

I personally think it&#039;s mostly #1, with maybe some or all of the others playing a role.  What seems definite is that she would not have been the first choice of his advisers/handlers, and it&#039;s 50/50 at this point whether she&#039;ll stay the nominee.  Especially with the news that her 17-year-old daughter is pregnant -- which I think is nobody&#039;s business but theirs EXCEPT for her vicious stance against birth control, against teaching real sex education in schools, and against abortion even in the case of rape and incest.  This calls HER values as a leader into question, but I don&#039;t fucking want to hear anyone bashing her kid.  

It has also come out that when Palin&#039;s water broke with the last pregnancy, she got on a plane for an 8-hour trip to Alaska rather than check into a big hospital in Texas.  With a high-risk pregnancy which they already knew was Downs&#039;, this is extremely irresponsible.  Interestingly, for the seven months prior to that birth, her other teenaged daughter had been absent from school and public view with mono.  Currently that baby, now five months old, is in the care of that teenaged daughter.  Again, the only decent thing to do is congratulate them on pulling together as a family and stick to the issues, which center around making birth control, family planning, and special needs care available for all those who don&#039;t share her religious views.  

Other Palin pluses, by the way, as a nominee include:
--Alaska as a state is completely wedded to Big Oil.  (But it&#039;s not counted as a large state, except geographically -- it has less than half a million in population, so no electoral votes to speak of.)
--She comes off as &quot;spunky&quot; and &quot;regular folks&quot; (as opposed to intellectual elite) to those who aren&#039;t especially progressive.
--Her beauty pageant background makes her very adept at media handling and presentation.
--She is disposable, should the need arise, without pissing off anybody except Alaska and the Jebus fanatics -- and the latter can be appeased if she is &quot;driven&quot; from her candidacy by the evil liberals making a big issue about her as a woman or her private life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palin as a choice was not vetted (McSame had met her exactly once and was apparently unaware, for example, of her current investigation on abuse of office charges) nor was she cleared through the RNC.  It appears to have been a desperation move on his part.  There&#8217;s many theories about WHY he went this course.  Here&#8217;s the predominant ones floating around on progressive blogs:</p>
<p>(1)  She is cloud-cuckoo-land Religious Right crazy.  They are ECSTATIC at this choice, and have reversed their move away from McSame now to raising money hand over fist for th RNC.  She is far more to the right than Reagan, Quayle or Dubya himself in terms of religious fanaticism.  Like, she may be part of that small subgroup of fundie who believe the Earth is flat (because the Bible doesn&#8217;t say it&#8217;s round &#8212; we have a member of the Texas House of Reps who has attempted to stop schools from teaching &#8220;round earth theory&#8221; &#8212; I&#8217;m not making this up.)  Therefore, he took his orders from Dobson via Cheney.</p>
<p>(2)  Tim &#8220;We don&#8217;t need no stinkin&#8217; bridge inspections&#8221; Pawlenty, Mitt &#8220;Magic Underwear&#8221; Romney, and Joe &#8220;Slip Me Some Tongue Dubya&#8221; Lieberman all said no to McSame because after the Democratic National Convention, it was clear he was going to lose.</p>
<p>(3)  He succumbed to his need to be surrounded by beauty queens on all fronts, and he thought it would make him look better standing next to her.  </p>
<p>(4)  He thought those who had supported Hillary would vote for any vagina at all.</p>
<p>(5)  It&#8217;s a brilliant Roveian plot to draw out the massive lefti woman-hating and rural-bashing rhetoric that was exhibited on far too many blogs during our own nominees campaign, disgusting women (especially working class women) and those who identify with rural values (not necessarily those who live in rural areas) to such an extent that they will swing to McCain for the election.  I have to admit, some so called &#8220;liberal&#8221; males out there are already proving this one right, they just cannot pass up the read meat of attacking a woman on gender terms.</p>
<p>I personally think it&#8217;s mostly #1, with maybe some or all of the others playing a role.  What seems definite is that she would not have been the first choice of his advisers/handlers, and it&#8217;s 50/50 at this point whether she&#8217;ll stay the nominee.  Especially with the news that her 17-year-old daughter is pregnant &#8212; which I think is nobody&#8217;s business but theirs EXCEPT for her vicious stance against birth control, against teaching real sex education in schools, and against abortion even in the case of rape and incest.  This calls HER values as a leader into question, but I don&#8217;t fucking want to hear anyone bashing her kid.  </p>
<p>It has also come out that when Palin&#8217;s water broke with the last pregnancy, she got on a plane for an 8-hour trip to Alaska rather than check into a big hospital in Texas.  With a high-risk pregnancy which they already knew was Downs&#8217;, this is extremely irresponsible.  Interestingly, for the seven months prior to that birth, her other teenaged daughter had been absent from school and public view with mono.  Currently that baby, now five months old, is in the care of that teenaged daughter.  Again, the only decent thing to do is congratulate them on pulling together as a family and stick to the issues, which center around making birth control, family planning, and special needs care available for all those who don&#8217;t share her religious views.  </p>
<p>Other Palin pluses, by the way, as a nominee include:<br />
&#8211;Alaska as a state is completely wedded to Big Oil.  (But it&#8217;s not counted as a large state, except geographically &#8212; it has less than half a million in population, so no electoral votes to speak of.)<br />
&#8211;She comes off as &#8220;spunky&#8221; and &#8220;regular folks&#8221; (as opposed to intellectual elite) to those who aren&#8217;t especially progressive.<br />
&#8211;Her beauty pageant background makes her very adept at media handling and presentation.<br />
&#8211;She is disposable, should the need arise, without pissing off anybody except Alaska and the Jebus fanatics &#8212; and the latter can be appeased if she is &#8220;driven&#8221; from her candidacy by the evil liberals making a big issue about her as a woman or her private life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeLandDeLakes</title>
		<link>http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/blank#comment-240224</link>
		<dc:creator>DeLandDeLakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/blank#comment-240224</guid>
		<description>....Except now with Hurricane Gustav coming and the convention pared down and possibly postponed, I&#039;m thinking that tomorrow the cops will take advantage of the lack of actual Republicans and media presence to swoop down on the excess of protesters and round them up before things finally get started. And the Republican party will capitalize on this disaster to make it look as though disaster relief is somehow partisan. fuckfuckfuckfuckfuck......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.Except now with Hurricane Gustav coming and the convention pared down and possibly postponed, I&#8217;m thinking that tomorrow the cops will take advantage of the lack of actual Republicans and media presence to swoop down on the excess of protesters and round them up before things finally get started. And the Republican party will capitalize on this disaster to make it look as though disaster relief is somehow partisan. fuckfuckfuckfuckfuck&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Other Andi</title>
		<link>http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/blank#comment-240223</link>
		<dc:creator>The Other Andi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/blank#comment-240223</guid>
		<description>McCain/Palin = The Manchurian Candidate meets The Handmaid&#039;s Tale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain/Palin = The Manchurian Candidate meets The Handmaid&#8217;s Tale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shadocat</title>
		<link>http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/blank#comment-240217</link>
		<dc:creator>shadocat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/blank#comment-240217</guid>
		<description>Alison (or anyone else out there)- have you seen this?

http://www.mahalo.com/Sarah_Palin_Pregnancy_Rumors

Perhaps Big Mac should&#039;ve taken a wee bit more time vetting his veep...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alison (or anyone else out there)- have you seen this?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mahalo.com/Sarah_Palin_Pregnancy_Rumors" rel="nofollow">http://www.mahalo.com/Sarah_Palin_Pregnancy_Rumors</a></p>
<p>Perhaps Big Mac should&#8217;ve taken a wee bit more time vetting his veep&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eva</title>
		<link>http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/blank#comment-240189</link>
		<dc:creator>Eva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/blank#comment-240189</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know anything about Sarah Palin, but I want to know why she was picked. I mean, ok, she&#039;s the governer of a very large state. But other than that, what? What, besides her gender and her conservatism, is the appeal, from the Republican point of view? Didn&#039;t they want someone who could actually take over if necessary? Or are they planning on having a phalanx of shadow administrators to do all the work like Rove, et al? Honestly, I am beginning to feel paranoid about this election. Are they going to throw it? Is there going to be some kind of major disaster that necessitates Bush staying in office past Jan. 19th? These two are so under qualified. What on earth is the Republican party thinking? I don&#039;t expect any answers this week via the RNC, so I figured if anyone is going to answer my semi-rhetorical questions it will be you-all. Or at least some sympathetic clucking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know anything about Sarah Palin, but I want to know why she was picked. I mean, ok, she&#8217;s the governer of a very large state. But other than that, what? What, besides her gender and her conservatism, is the appeal, from the Republican point of view? Didn&#8217;t they want someone who could actually take over if necessary? Or are they planning on having a phalanx of shadow administrators to do all the work like Rove, et al? Honestly, I am beginning to feel paranoid about this election. Are they going to throw it? Is there going to be some kind of major disaster that necessitates Bush staying in office past Jan. 19th? These two are so under qualified. What on earth is the Republican party thinking? I don&#8217;t expect any answers this week via the RNC, so I figured if anyone is going to answer my semi-rhetorical questions it will be you-all. Or at least some sympathetic clucking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

