<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Rule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/the-rule/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/the-rule</link>
	<description>News about Alison Bechdel's comic strip Dykes to Watch Out For, and her graphic novel Fun Home</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:50:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=235</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graceling: So Close, Yet So Far &#171; A Working Title</title>
		<link>http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/the-rule#comment-302935</link>
		<dc:creator>Graceling: So Close, Yet So Far &#171; A Working Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 04:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/the-rule#comment-302935</guid>
		<description>[...] fails miserably at the Bechdel Test, though. This is the test, (usually applied to movies/tv shows) that asks three [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fails miserably at the Bechdel Test, though. This is the test, (usually applied to movies/tv shows) that asks three [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New &#8216;Trek&#8217; Has It All &#8230; Except Strong Female Characters &#124; Video Buzz</title>
		<link>http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/the-rule#comment-302610</link>
		<dc:creator>New &#8216;Trek&#8217; Has It All &#8230; Except Strong Female Characters &#124; Video Buzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 00:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/the-rule#comment-302610</guid>
		<description>[...] be interested in seeing a movie. (See our Cinematical Seven on Bechdel Law) It first appeared in a 1985 installment of her long-running strip, Dykes to Watch Out For, and it goes like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be interested in seeing a movie. (See our Cinematical Seven on Bechdel Law) It first appeared in a 1985 installment of her long-running strip, Dykes to Watch Out For, and it goes like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New &#8216;Trek&#8217; Has It All &#8230; Except Strong Female Characters&#160;&#124;&#160;CloneMovie.com</title>
		<link>http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/the-rule#comment-302570</link>
		<dc:creator>New &#8216;Trek&#8217; Has It All &#8230; Except Strong Female Characters&#160;&#124;&#160;CloneMovie.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/the-rule#comment-302570</guid>
		<description>[...] Sev&#173;en o&#173;n Bec&#173;h&#173;del Law) It first appe&#173;are&#173;d in&#173; a&#173; 1985 ins&#173;ta&#173;llm&#173;&#173;ent o&#173;f he&#173;r lo&#173;n&#173;g&#173;-ru&#173;n&#173;n&#173;in&#173;g&#173; strip, Dyke&#173;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sev&#173;en o&#173;n Bec&#173;h&#173;del Law) It first appe&#173;are&#173;d in&#173; a&#173; 1985 ins&#173;ta&#173;llm&#173;&#173;ent o&#173;f he&#173;r lo&#173;n&#173;g&#173;-ru&#173;n&#173;n&#173;in&#173;g&#173; strip, Dyke&#173;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St. Gay of the Perpetual Chaste Bro Hug &#171; Booze. TV. Food. How Do *You* Spend Friday Nights?</title>
		<link>http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/the-rule#comment-301116</link>
		<dc:creator>St. Gay of the Perpetual Chaste Bro Hug &#171; Booze. TV. Food. How Do *You* Spend Friday Nights?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/the-rule#comment-301116</guid>
		<description>[...] For the simple fact that there is a lot more time to fill, far more tv shows than movies pass the Bechdel Test (The test is: are there (1) two women (2) who talk to each other (3) about something other than a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For the simple fact that there is a lot more time to fill, far more tv shows than movies pass the Bechdel Test (The test is: are there (1) two women (2) who talk to each other (3) about something other than a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On the Ladies&#8217; No 1 Dedective Agency, and the Bechdel Test &#171; Modus dopens</title>
		<link>http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/the-rule#comment-300163</link>
		<dc:creator>On the Ladies&#8217; No 1 Dedective Agency, and the Bechdel Test &#171; Modus dopens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/the-rule#comment-300163</guid>
		<description>[...] the Ladies&#8217; No 1 Dedective Agency, and the Bechdel&#160;Test  The Bechdel-Wallace Test (see the H2G2 entry for more info) is a set of guideline criteria for films (or other media) . The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Ladies&#8217; No 1 Dedective Agency, and the Bechdel&nbsp;Test  The Bechdel-Wallace Test (see the H2G2 entry for more info) is a set of guideline criteria for films (or other media) . The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog@Newsarama &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Casting Suggestions for Bat-flicks</title>
		<link>http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/the-rule#comment-297922</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog@Newsarama &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Casting Suggestions for Bat-flicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/the-rule#comment-297922</guid>
		<description>[...] film, and we both agreed that it was time to up the female presence. To make the film pass the Bechdel test, what if Nolan added Harley Quinn? The Joker&#8217;s gone&#8211;they&#8217;re obviously not going [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] film, and we both agreed that it was time to up the female presence. To make the film pass the Bechdel test, what if Nolan added Harley Quinn? The Joker&#8217;s gone&#8211;they&#8217;re obviously not going [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: easyVegan.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; VeganMoFo, Day 31+: King Kong, Vegan Junk Food &#38; Reflections on VeganMoFo</title>
		<link>http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/the-rule#comment-295454</link>
		<dc:creator>easyVegan.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; VeganMoFo, Day 31+: King Kong, Vegan Junk Food &#38; Reflections on VeganMoFo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/the-rule#comment-295454</guid>
		<description>[...] was even more impressed with Untraceable, which passes The Bechdel test, namely, that a female friendly (read: not sexist) movie must have 1) at least two women, 2) who [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was even more impressed with Untraceable, which passes The Bechdel test, namely, that a female friendly (read: not sexist) movie must have 1) at least two women, 2) who [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Property of a Lady &#187; Monday Movie Review: Frost/Nixon</title>
		<link>http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/the-rule#comment-294866</link>
		<dc:creator>Property of a Lady &#187; Monday Movie Review: Frost/Nixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/the-rule#comment-294866</guid>
		<description>[...] What everyone is talking about with Frost/Nixon is the performances. Sheen and Langella are great, of course. I mean, this whole movie is so watchable, so compelling, and it&#8217;s really just guys talking (there is only one important woman; the movie fails the Bechdel test). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What everyone is talking about with Frost/Nixon is the performances. Sheen and Langella are great, of course. I mean, this whole movie is so watchable, so compelling, and it&#8217;s really just guys talking (there is only one important woman; the movie fails the Bechdel test). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moot Point &#187; (Bi)Weekly Movies, November 17-30</title>
		<link>http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/the-rule#comment-293202</link>
		<dc:creator>Moot Point &#187; (Bi)Weekly Movies, November 17-30</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/the-rule#comment-293202</guid>
		<description>[...] son, we see her thriving, having graduated to her own office at the phone company. It even passes the Bechdel test: in the sanitarium, Angeline Jolie talks to Amy Ryan (who plays a prostitute who&#8217;s in there [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] son, we see her thriving, having graduated to her own office at the phone company. It even passes the Bechdel test: in the sanitarium, Angeline Jolie talks to Amy Ryan (who plays a prostitute who&#8217;s in there [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smite Me! [.net] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Vantage Point passes the Bechdel test, but barely.</title>
		<link>http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/the-rule#comment-293057</link>
		<dc:creator>Smite Me! [.net] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Vantage Point passes the Bechdel test, but barely.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 18:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/the-rule#comment-293057</guid>
		<description>[...] a feminist perspective, Vantage Point passes the Bechdel test, but [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a feminist perspective, Vantage Point passes the Bechdel test, but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

